Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘republican’

With the seating of the new Congress, much attention has been given to the Republican pledge to repeal Obamacare, or at least their desire to defund major parts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). High on the list of defunding targets are the state mandated health insurance exchanges (section 1311).

The state exchanges are designed to be a marketplace where people not covered through their employers would shop for and purchase health insurance, and if qualified, would receive subsidies.  The PPACA mandates that all states must establish insurance exchanges for individuals to purchase insurance by 2014, or the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will establish and run the exchange for the states who aren’t compliant.

The exchanges remain one of the most controversial aspects of the PPACA because of the large unfunded mandates they place on the states, in addition:

  • The exchanges are the vehicle for supporting the Individual Mandate (the portion of the Reform Act that requires all US citizens to be covered under health insurance), and because of the very ambiguous rules legislated in the establishment of the exchanges.
  • Half of the U.S. State Attorneys General are suing the federal government to block the mandate to implement insurance exchanges, claiming the rules are too ambiguous, that the unfunded mandate will bankrupt the states, and that the mandate is an overreach of federal powers.

The national debate on healthcare and popular sentiment to make health insurance more accessible and affordable has forced the health insurance companies to re-think how they market and sell their products.  As we have spoken about many times in the last year, the health insurance market is at the forefront of a fundamental shift to a retail business model from its legacy wholesale roots.

Despite the public scrutiny being paid to the insurance exchange mandate and congressional risks to rejigger the entire legislation, TripleTree is seeing a much more interesting dynamic forming in the healthcare insurance marketplace – early steps to establish alternative insurance exchange marketplaces by commercial entities.

A commercial healthcare exchange is a private venture between one or more insurance companies and a retailer (such as Walmart), bank, property and casualty insurance company.  It could in reality, include a range of consumer-oriented entity that unite to create a health insurance marketplace.

In the individual and small group market, consumers may find much higher value (and savings) in bundled insurance products (i.e. property, auto, life and health) than they would in singulary buying health insurance in the state dictated and controlled exchange.   Complicating things, this is especially true for consumers that would not qualify for the federal or state subsidies that can only be received if insurance is purchased in the public state exchange.

Today, most property and casualty holders get a discount for carrying multiple policies from the same carrier (e.g. homeowners and auto combined might yield a 15% discount on both policies).   Our research has led to many discussions with property and casualty insurers interested in bundling health insurance though a partnership (rather than direct underwriting).  Their goal?…aggregate and manage a larger share of consumer spend on insurance products.

Similarly, we are aware of large national retailers seeking to implement a proprietary insurance marketplace of as a way of extending a service mix to their customers, building brand loyalty and retaining customers within their own pharmacies.  While some retailers may form single entity partnerships, others see themselves as a marketplace for multiple carriers competing for business.  We anticipate seeing these commercial insurance exchange marketplaces begin rolling out sometime in 2011.

Though these commercial exchanges may not solve the adverse selection problem that the PPACA exchanges were designed to address, they should prove a successful partnership for the retailer and the insurance company that otherwise has difficulty marketing directly to consumers.  While states dither and politics hinder the roll-out of the public exchanges, many forward thinking commercial business recognize the market opportunity to provide a better insurance buying experience and are moving quickly to meet a market need – the way that free economies are supposed to work.

This is a thorny, emotional issue – and our research and sell-side mandates are paying close attention as technology-based solutions emerge.

Let us know what you think and have a great week!

Scott Donahue

Scott Donahue is a Vice President at TripleTree covering infrastructure and application technologies across numerous industries and specializes in assessing the “master brands” of IT and Healthcare. Follow Scott on Twitter or e-mail him at sdonahue@triple-tree.com

Read Full Post »

The results of the November mid-term elections signaled Republican gains across the board and a majority win in the House. This power shift creates an air of uncertainly and raises a major question for the future of healthcare in the United States.  For those in the Healthcare IT domain, many wondered if this political sea change would affect the $20 Billion promised to EMR adoption through “meaningful use” in the HITECH Act.

Many pundits believe a major focus of the recent election was Obama’s healthcare reform legislation. In fact, according to HIMSS, nearly 20% of voters indicated that health was the single most significant factor in their vote.  It’s important to remember that the HITECH Act is part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) established in 2009 and not part Obama’s healthcare reform initiative.  The HITECH Act was established as an important initiative to create jobs and usher America’s outdated healthcare system into the modern age.  When HITECH was established in 2009 it received wide support from democrats and republicans alike.

So what do these election results mean for the future of the HITECH Act?

  • Repeal or reduction in funding is highly unlikely. Most experts can agree with the conclusion that healthcare IT funding is not a key item targeted for spending cuts.  According to Jennifer Haberkorn, a healthcare policy and politics reporter with POLITICO, “It’s not on the radar”.  Haberkorn and other experts agree that Obama’s Healthcare Reform is the banner issue and the HITECH Act should proceed as planned with full funding.
  • Increased oversight on all healthcare spending, including HITECH. More scrutiny will be placed on all government spending going forward and there will be no exception for the HITECH Act.
  • More uncertainty. All of these factors create uncertainty.  This could lead to hospitals spending money quickly rather than wisely. Changes to the definition of “meaningful use” or other legislative modifications will create headaches for healthcare institutions banking on these Federal dollars.

The view of TripleTree and most experts is that HITECH Act is safe for the time being.  This is good news to the Healthcare IT domain and those who are driving to see technology improvements in the U.S. healthcare system.  TripleTree is closely following these developments. Stay tuned for updates related to the HITECH Act.  Visit www.himss.org to see a detailed presentation entitled, “A Post – Election Analysis: Potential Effects on Health IT Policy”.

Michael Boardman

Michael Boardman is an associate at TripleTree covering the healthcare and technology industries, specializing in clinical software solutions.  Follow Michael on Twitter or e-mail him at mboardman@triple-tree.com.

Read Full Post »